Posts Tagged ‘Greenhouse Gases’

US carmakers need 7 years to match Toyota’s efficiency

Posted Wednesday, May 20th, 2009 by admin

vw-235-mpg-car-action-193Yesterday was historic: US car makers agreed to produce 35 mpg cars by 2016. Wow! My Prius gets 60 mpg now. But US car makers apparently aren’t that innovative. European car makers by 2016 are going to have to get 45 mpg. So this ensures that US car makers market share will continue to decline as oil prices inevitably rise. If you doubt oil prices will rise here’s an interesting tidbit: Chinese consumer are now buying more than a million cars a month — that’s going to increase demand for oil and drive the price up. Just wait till we come out of the current recession and oil prices race back to $147 a barrel.

But back to fuel efficiency: Volkswagen has a 235 mpg car already. But US car makers need another seven years to take a baby step. Now a truly impressive goal would be to see the US commit to 100 mpg average fuel efficiency by 2016. That’s what I would call a stretch goal. A goal akin to JFK telling the nation that within a decade the US would put a man on the moon — and then eight years later acheiving it.

Greenhouse gases a ‘health threat’, declares EPA

Posted Wednesday, May 20th, 2009 by admin

By: Jordana Levine

Climate change poses a threat to society – the U.S. government made its first admission ever concerning this issue. On April 17, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) said that greenhouse gases are a danger to the public’s health and well-being, both now and for future generations.

The EPA recognized the dangers of carbon dioxide, methane, hydrofluorocarbons, and three other greenhouse gases, which lead to climate change. Climate change has been found to lead to a higher concentration of ozone at ground level, which is harmful to our health.  Although ozone is a useful greenhouse gas that protects humans from UV rays when it is found in the Earth’s stratosphere,[1]  it can have a damaging, and even fatal impact on human and animal respiratory systems when it is at ground level.[2]

Climate change can lead to increased drought, flooding, wildfires, intense storms, and damage water resources, agriculture, and all kinds of animals and the ecosystems they live in. These issues, among others, can have a significant impact on the health of various groups of people, including the poor, those in poor health, infants, the elderly, and indigenous groups.[3]

This new direction will support Obama administration’s efforts to focus on green jobs, clean energy, and new technologies, notes EPA’s Administrator Lisa Jackson – and says that these findings have encouraged the agency to search for the best ways to combat climate change’s negative impacts.[4]

The recent findings on the dangers of climate change have entered a public comment period, which lasts for 60 days. Still, both President Barack Obama and Jackson have made it clear that they support a legislation to tackle the issue and eventually lead to an economy based on clean, emission-free energy.[5]

Although Canada may not be actively combating climate change and its potential to affect society at the present time, Health Canada did write a report in 2000 acknowledging its dangers.  Health Canada noted both the short- and long-term effects of greenhouse gases on human health, and noted improving air quality would lead to noticeable improvements in health.

Health Canada also mentioned that, assuming the country could decrease emissions by 50 percent, the health improvements would be 40 times as effective if the U.S. became a participant in attempts to lower greenhouse gases.[6]   With the U.S. poised and willing to become a clean energy economy, Canada could join forces and contribute to a vast improvement in air quality and the health of the population as a whole.

1  WHO/Europe.  “Stratospheric ozone depletion.”  26 Mar 2007. http://www.euro.who.int/globalchange/Topics/20020627_1
2  WHO/Europe.  “7th meeting: modelling and assessment of health impacts of particulate matter and ozone from LRTAP.”  20 Dec 2005. http://www.euro.who.int/air/activities/20050418_6
3  Climate and Capitalism. “EPA: Greenhouse Gases Threaten Health.” 18 Apr 2009. http://climateandcapitalism.com/?p=664
4  EPA. “Administrator Jackson’s Message about the Greenhouse Gas Endangerment Finding.” 8 May 2009. http://www.epa.gov/administrator/greenhouse.htm
5  Climate and Capitalism. “EPA: Greenhouse Gases”
6  Health Canada. “Climate Change and Health Economic Advisory Panel - Final Report on Health Impacts of the Greenhouse Gases (Ghg) Mitigation Measures - January 2000.”  3 Aug 2005. http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/ewh-semt/pubs/climat/greenhouse_gases-gaz_effet/outcomes-resultats-eng.php

Clearing the air: Milan’s Ecopass

Posted Wednesday, May 20th, 2009 by admin
Photo: Damien Meyer

Photo: Damien Meyer

By: Jordana Levine

Milan’s Ecopass is curbing pollution and traffic. The city has one of the highest levels of car ownership in the world, in a country known across Europe to be heavily polluted.[1]   However, the Ecopass is changing Milan’s grimy image.

The Ecopass involves a toll that is based on the amount of emissions a vehicle gives off, and is meant to control the levels of emissions and congestion in the streets of downtown Milan.

The eight-square-kilometre area controlled by the Ecopass, called the ZTL (Zona a Traffico Limitato), has 43 electric gates to enter and exit from with cameras to monitor the area.  To come in, drivers must buy a daily or annual pass that admits them into the area. The price of the ticket is based on how kind their vehicle is to the environment.  While hybrid and electric cars can enter for free, old or large vehicles that pollute the air can be charged up to 10 Euros (approximately $16 Canadian) every day.

The test period in 2008 was a success, causing the scheme to extend until the end of 2009. In 2008, over 21,000 fewer vehicles entered Milan’s ZTL every day and an additional 19,100 people began using public transportation daily. The largest drop in cars was seen with those that polluted the most, since it’s so expensive for them to enter the ZTL zone.[2]

With the decrease in traffic, the smog has begun to clear. Milan Ecopass noted that the number of high pollution days in the ZTL dropped by 60, compared to the average number of high pollution days between 2002 and 2007.[3]

Congestion pricing, which charges vehicles to drive through congested areas, is used in several cities around the world, including London, Stockholm, Singapore, San Diego and Minneapolis.  They charge vehicles to drive through specific passageways during peak hours, though, rather than having a barrier around a large area the way that Milan does.[4]

Singapore became the first city with a cordon-based congestion pricing system in 1975.  Since then, an ERP (Electronic Road Pricing) system was initiated in 1998 that automatically charges for different times and locations as the vehicle passes through.[5]  Singapore now has 25% less accidents and 45% less congestion.[6]

In London, congestion has dropped 30% since its program was put in place in 2003.  Buses are faster and more reliable, more people ride bicycles, and, while the city used to have the most polluted air in the UK, London has seen a 20% drop in fossil fuel use and carbon dioxide emissions.[7]   Although the city was originally concerned that the Congestion Zone could mean less business in the area, London is the UK’s leading city in economic growth.[8]

The systems have maneuvered their way towards both of their destinations, lowering pollution and traffic levels in every city.  They have also increased road safety, the use and quality of public transportation, and gained the majority of the public’s approval.

 

1  BBC.  “Milan introduces traffic charge.”  2 Jan 2008.  http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/7167992.stm
2  Ecopass.  “Report Ecopass.” 9 Dec 2008.  http://www.comune.milano.it/dseserver/ecopass/report.html
3  Ibid.
4  Transportation Alternatives. “Congestions Pricing | International Examples.”  2009.  http://www.transalt.org/campaigns/congestion/international
5  Ibid.
6  Environmental Defense Fund.  “Congestion Pricing.” 1 Apr 2009. http://www.edf.org/page.cfm?tagID=6241
7  EDF.  “Congestion Pricing.”
8  Transportation Alternatives. “Congestion Pricing.”

Video

A Crisis is a terrible thing to waste – Coming 2010

Jim Harris discusses the 4 concurrent challenges that nations are currently facing and provides a set of solutions in his new book A Crisis is a terrible thing to waste.

More Videos...

Tag Cloud

Associated Links