Posts Tagged ‘Greenhouse Gases’

DLSC homes decrease GHGs by 5 tonnes each/yr

Posted Monday, June 15th, 2009 by admin

jlevineBy: Jordana Levine

The first of its kind in North America, the Drake Landing Solar Community (DLSC) is heating its homes with solar energy and reducing five tonnes of greenhouse gases per year in every house.  The community, located in Okotoks, Alberta, has 52 homes heated by seasonal thermal energy storage; the solar heat is stored underground in the summer and used in the homes during the winter.

The project, which was first created by Natural Resources Canada (NRCan), began collecting solar energy in June of 2007 and, after five years, the community is expected to receive 90 percent of its heat from solar alone. The need for non-renewable fossil fuels will diminish and shift to a cleaner and more sustainable unlimited source of energy: the sun.

The DLSC project leader, Doug MeClenahan, says that there are almost no other projects like this one anywhere in the world.  “You could probably count them on two hands.”dlsc-aerial

The community’s space and water heating comes from solar energy, which is collected by 800 panels arranged on garage roofs around the community.  Each panel generates about 1.5 MW of thermal power on a summer’s day. There is a combination of seasonal and short-term thermal storage (STTS), with boreholes in the ground to store the seasonal energy.

When heat is transferred to the homes, there is an automatic valve in the basement of every house that shuts off the heat transfer when the temperature of the thermostat in the home is reached.  If the STTS doesn’t have enough heat to distribute to all the homes, there is a back-up gas boiler Energy Centre that will turn on to help out.

Energy in a community the size of the DLSC costs 14 to 17 cents per kWh.  “Fifty-two homes was a reasonable size, but it was still considered to small… to be cost effective today,” says McClenahan. He explains that the next step is an analysis of a larger-scale project using a computer simulation.  The analysis should be completed within a year.

“If you go to larger scale, you have much less surface area for heat loss… so the efficiency can go up considerably,” McClenahan explains.  “The bigger the project, the less cost it is per unit volume or per unit area.”  Drake Landing isn’t that effective now because it’s losing heat on the surface area of the land.

Still, McClenahan says, I know [the technology]’s promising enough that we should pursue it until we are able to do the analysis.”  However, beyond that, he says it’s incredibly difficult to tell exactly what the costs and savings could be in a larger community. “Until we do the analysis, I’d hate to guess.”

The community does more for the environment than just conserve energy, though. Homes are designed with low-impact landscaping and use locally manufactured materials.  The materials used include upgraded insulation, certified sustainable lumber, drywall made from recycled materials, and well-insulated windows, among other environmentally friendly products.

Also, the homes are all required to follow The Town of Okotoks’ water stewardship measures: low flush toilets, ultra low flow showerheads and faucets, and insulated water lines.  Larger homes require a recirculation pump and every home is supplied with a low water consumption dishwasher and clothes washer.  A rain barrel supplies water for gardening.

By the end of the community’s second year, McClenahan says it’s already receiving 67 percent of its space heating from the sun.  “We’re hoping that this will continue to increase” to over 90 percent.

“I would like to see, in the next 2 to 3 years, a [larger] follow-up project,” says McClenahan, hopefully with bigger cities in Canada like Toronto and Montreal.  “We don’t want to end up with just one demonstration and that’s it.”

Intel to open LEED certified building in Israel

Posted Friday, June 12th, 2009 by admin

Intel in Haifa

By: Jordana Levine

After much debate and analysis, Intel is preparing to open its first green-registered building.[1]  The research and development building in Haifa, Israel will cost $600,000 of green investments, which will be paid off in just three years.[2]

The building will follow the Leadership in Energy and Environmental (LEED) rating system, which is a voluntary, consensus-based standard to develop sustainable and efficient buildings.[3]  The Intel building is receiving the LEED certification for a variety of technologies that the building is being outfitted with; it will have an environmentally friendly construction process with green materials, natural lighting via an internal patio that distributes light from an atrium, efficient electricity and air conditioning and an irrigation system that uses recycled water only.[4]  It is set to open in early in 2010.[5]

Intel hopes that the building in Haifa will lead to more LEED certified office buildings and, ultimately, to Intel’s first LEED certified Fab.  A Fab is a semiconductor fabrication plant, meaning it is a factory that fabricates designs for other companies to use as well.[6]

Although Intel has reduced its overall needs for freshwater in the long run, the corporation’s water consumption actually rose by four percent between 2007 and 2008.  Intel says this increase is probably because of production growth and the complexity of its new manufacturing processes, which require more water.[7]  Although some countries can withstand this strain on their freshwater supply, it could be detrimental to Israel’s fragile water supply, which has to be monitored carefully as it is.

Overall, Intel cut its greenhouse gas emission by 27 percent in 2008, and the company’s Corporate Responsibility Report aims to decrease its carbon footprint by 20 percent from 2007 until 2012.  Intel is a strong supporter of green power, having bought over 1 billion kWh of green power each year to fulfill 47 percent of the company’s electricity needs; Intel also built the first solar installations.[8]

In 2009, Intel will invest more than $5 million on over 30 projects to save a minimum of 30 million kWh of electricity each year.  The corporation has already targeted energy efficiency and conservation since 2001, saving Intel more than $50 million and 500 million kWh.[9]

1  Kloosterman, Karin.  “Intel Makes a Green Debut in Haifa, Israel.”  TreeHugger.  8 Dec 2006.  http://www.treehugger.com/files/2006/12/intel_makes_a_g.php
2  Solomon, Stephen.  “Intel Saves Air and Money.” Scientific American – Earth 3.0: 18.5, 2008.
3  Kloosterman, Karin.  “Intel Makes a Green Debut.”
4  “Intel’s First Green Building.”  http://www.intel.com/cd/corporate/europe/emea/eng/339775.htm
5  “Intel Cuts Emissions by 27% in 2008.”  Environmental Leader.  21 May 2009.  http://www.environmentalleader.com/2009/05/21/intel-cuts-emissions-by-27-in-2008/
6  “Intel’s First Green Building.”
7  “Intel Cuts Emissions.”
8  “Intel Cuts Emissions.”
9  Ibid.

New Google gadget shows energy consumption online

Posted Thursday, June 11th, 2009 by admin

By: Jordana Levine

Google is creating yet another application personalized to its users.  The Google PowerMeter will soon allow customers to see detailed description of their homes’ energy consumption.

Although many homes have ‘smart meters,’ which allow people to access information about their electricity, they don’t yet have an easy way to look at the details of their energy usage.  The PowerMeter works by sending the information from the smart meter to the internet, where it is read and analyzed.  The PowerMeter will show customers the elements of their energy usage through a Google gadget… for free!

Google found that for every six households that save 10 percent on electricity, it is the equivalent of reducing carbon emissions by one regular car.  Studies show if you get to look at your personal energy information, it is likely that you’ll end up saving 5-15% on monthly power bills – and people who actually take the time to replace old energy-draining appliances can save much more. So using the PowerMeter could help lower emissions immensely.

The product isn’t widely available yet, but it’s being tested on a handful of Google’s employees and utility partners.  Toronto Hydro is participating in the test run, along with eight other partners from the US and India.  The PowerMeter is expected to go public later in 2009.

To find out more, go to the Google PowerMeter website.

Nations everywhere boast a ‘green stimulus’

Posted Monday, June 8th, 2009 by admin

jlevineBy: Jordana Levine

International climate change talks are continuing in Bonn, Germany.  The second round of discussions begun on June 1, 2009, and the negotiating time for the 192 collaborating countries ends in mid-July. By then, they need to reach an agreement with new emissions reduction targets and compensation packages for poor countries that have already been him with impacts of climate change.  These new decisions will be the basis for the final negotiations in Copenhagen in December 2009.[1]

These discussions on how to replace Kyoto Protocol targets are pushing countries to pump money into a “green stimulus.”  China and the US, who never signed the Kyoto Protocol, are likely to join in the new plans for shrinking greenhouse gas emissions.[2]

Canada has set aside eight percent, or US$2.6 billion of its total stimulus package, for green measures.  Although Canada’s emissions have gone in the opposite direction, reaching 26 percent above the 1990 levels and 33.8 percent above the country’s Kyoto targets[3], the country has agreed to cut emissions by 20 percent from 2006 to 2020.  The majority of the money is estimated to increase clean energy and create 407,000 jobs over 5 years:[4]

greenstimulus-graphs-ft-canada

The US is setting aside $112.3 billion for green measures, 12 percent of its fiscal stimulus.  The nation’s first stimulus package, which was approved in October 2008, contained a lot more features than the second one, which was approved February 2009 and cut out $57 billion of environmental spending.  Originally, it would have included $18.2 billion in taxes cuts and clean energy credits and $2 billion for carbon capture and storage.  Still, the updated stimulus gives $22.5 billion for renewable energy incentives, $52 billion for energy efficiency, including updating the electricity grid, and $10 billion for public transit.  The green stimulus is projected to create 2.5 million green jobs.[5]

China, the country whose emissions grew 250 percent between 1990 and 2006, plans to use 38 percent of its stimulus, equivalent to US$22.8 billion, to go green, according to HSBC.  (However, Beijing and other economists say this number is higher than what they will invest.)  Their green package will include over ¥350 billion (US$51 billion) for environmental projects and around ¥450 billion (US$66 billion) for the country’s rail infrastructure.[6]  China is spending the most money per-capita to invest in going green.[7]

The European Union has set aside a whopping 59 percent of its fiscal stimulus, €16.4 billion (of US$22.8 billion), for green measures.  The EU recovery plan should get the European Investment Bank to give an extra €12 billion of funding for green infrastructure over two years.[8]

1 Marsden, William.  “Crunch time for climate talks.”  Ottawa Citizen.  6 Jun 2009. http://www.ottawacitizen.com/business/fp/Crunch+time+climate+talks/1669662/story.html
2  Pedersen, Mike.  “Keeping ahead of the green curve.” Ottawa Citizen.  5 Jun 2009.   http://www.ottawacitizen.com/Technology/Keeping+ahead+green+curve/1652801/story.html
3  Munro, Margaret.  “Canada may be blowing smoke about intentions to reduce greenhouse gas.”  Canada.com.  21 Apr 2009.  http://www.canada.com/Canada+blowing+smoke+about+intentions+reduce+greenhouse/1517913/story.html
4  Bernard, Steve and others.  “Which country has the greenest bail-out?” Financial Times.  2 Mar 2009.  http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/cc207678-0738-11de-9294-000077b07658.html?nclick_check=1
5  Steve Bernard and others. “Which country?”
6  Steve Bernard and others. “Which country?”
7  Mike Pedersen.  “Keeping ahead”
8  Steve Bernard and others. “Which country?”

Inaction will cost $7 trillion

Posted Tuesday, June 2nd, 2009 by admin

By: Jordana Levine

If the issues of climate change are not addressed, it could cost every person on earth $1000 a year, or $7 trillion worldwide, says Nicholas Stern, former World Bank chief economist.  In the report, Climate Change and Green Jobs: Labour’s Challenges and Opportunities, the Canadian Labour Congress (CLC) stresses that taking action will cost a lot less than doing nothing.

If the federal government invested $30 billion over ten years to transition to an economy that is consciously aware of climate change, 330,000 jobs would be created and Canada’s GDP would increase by $140 billion.  There would be $95 billion added to personal income and $28 billion in energy savings.

Just under half of Canada’s CO2 emissions come from heavy industry, mainly using coal, gas and oil.  The report gives the example of the tarsands, which the CLC says are the single most destructive project anywhere in the world, consuming one gallon of oil for every two gallons it produces.  The tarsands have already made a hole the size of Vancouver Island, and it is predicted to grow by 400-500% in the next ten years if no changes are made, which would make the area the size of Florida.  The CLC urges Canada to stop racing to provide the US with oil and focus on slowing down the use of non-renewable energy in its own country.

The CLC believes that good jobs and a strong economy will only happen if we take into account every area that contributes to a high-quality life, including the economy, jobs, equality an the environment.  Both the global economy and the environment will be in major trouble if temperatures rise more than two degrees Celsius, leading to destruction of ecosystems, hugely diminished biodiversity, dangerously high sea levels and extreme weather.

The CLC especially supports four major areas:
•    Promoting energy efficiency
•    Investing in rail and mass transit infrastructure
•    Creating proper fuel efficiency standards
•    Developing renewable energy sources

The report stresses the importance of ensuring that policies, such as carbon taxes, do not increase inequality between classes.  The biggest polluters should be paying the most and household carbon taxes should only be imposed if 100% of the revenue goes towards reducing greenhouse gas emissions. A Just Transition Fund is a vital aspect that would compensate communities and individuals for wage cuts, displacement and job losses; it would fund the retraining of these workers and encourage them to work in a greener economy without diminishing the quality of life or contributing to inequality.  

CLC: “There will be no good jobs on a dead planet”

Posted Monday, June 1st, 2009 by admin

By: Jordana Levine

To prevent global warming, Canadian experts call for a 25% reduction below 1990 levels of CO2 emissions by 2020 and 80% below by 2050.  

The CLC Statement on Climate Change was written for the House of Commons regarding Bill C-30: Canada’s Clean Air and Climate Change Act as a recommendation.  It insists, “There will be no good jobs on a dead planet.”

The statement highlights key opportunities to create new jobs that do not generate emissions.  A serious program to retrofit older houses in Canada over 25 years would create 50,000 jobs a year on its own; construction jobs can substitute industrial, polluting jobs.  There could also be opportunities for jobs developing efficient and renewable fuels.  The CLC gives a number of ways that new industries could create more jobs that are kinder to the earth.

The CLC insists on creating strategies to regulate practices, encourage public investment and get the government directly involved through taxes and spending measures.  The government will need to be active, insuring that it makes useful investments that will help us transition to an environmentally sustainable, low-carbon economy.

The CLC calls for eliminating tax subsidies for the oil and gas industry.  Instead, the government should provide companies with tax incentives to invest in equipment that reduces emissions and that there should be a cap-and-trade system to limit emissions. Emissions caps should be lowered as green strategies and tax measures improve and the cost of reducing emissions falls.  The Pembina Institute and other experts calculate that a carbon charge of $30 per tonne would force actual change in an orderly manner.

The report points out that energy efficient and low-carbon economies are more labour intensive, creating new opportunities for workers, but notes that some sectors will see job loss.  The CLC suggests that a Just Transition fund should be set up, which will compensate workers for loss of money and contribute to retraining them in new, greener fields.

The Canadian Labour Congress (CLC) calls for new, effective climate change policies to keep emissions down and provide new jobs centred around environmentally sustainable practices in the workplace.

The CLC brings Canada’s national and international unions, as well as provincial and territorial labour federations and district labour councils.  The members work in nearly every sector, occupation, and area of the country.

“Greening” the economy across the board

Posted Friday, May 29th, 2009 by admin

unep-background-paper-on-green-jobs

By: Jordana Levine

We are on the verge of an economic transformation to a greener economy, notes the United Nations Environment Program (UNEP).

Compared to fossil fuels, renewable energy generates more jobs per dollar invested.  Looking at the countries that had data available, the world employed nearly 2.3 million people in the renewable energy sector in 2006.  The UNEP report estimates that there could be over 20 million workers in this area by 2030.

Energy efficiency retrofits of buildings not only creates new jobs it also reduces carbon emissions.  It has been estimated that this could reduce CO2 emissions 29% by 2020 at no extra cost, thereby fighting climate change and avoiding the increase in extreme weather it causes.

Other new jobs while decreasing damage to the environment include development and alteration of mass transportation and creating small, sustainable farms. 

The UNEP points out the importance of having a properly developed system to support the “greening” of our economy.  Some areas that need to be addressed are: the importance of sharing research both within the community and worldwide, job training for the new types of work that will arise, and assistance for the affected workers who may lose jobs in areas that cloud up the environment with smog.

A solid green jobs strategy will help ensure that the money spent between now and 2030 generates workplaces and jobs with low carbon emissions.  The UNEP report points out that green jobs will “radiate” across various workplaces, creating a greener economy overall.

The UNEP Background Paper on Green Jobs focuses on the Green Jobs Initiative, which is a collaborative project of the UNEP, International Labour Organization (ILO) and International Trade Union Confederation (ATUC).

The Green Jobs Initiative looks at, analyzes and promotes employment in relation to climate change.  It supports jobs that are environmentally sustainable and development that contributes to the environment’ well-being.  These “green jobs” are defined as positions in agriculture, manufacturing, research and development, administrative, and services activities meant to combat environmental issues.

“Locavores” shorten the gap between farmer and plate

Posted Tuesday, May 26th, 2009 by admin

Jordana LevineBy: Jordana Levine

In North America, food travels an average of 1,500 to 3,000 miles before it reaches your plate.[1]  This means high levels of greenhouse gases are emitted from the vehicles that get it there.

“Locavores” are some of the latest environmentalists, eating only foods that are produced within a 100-mile radius.  Although these people may feel that they are eating locally for the environment, the truth is that their best contribution is to their own communities.  Locally grown food is great for the local economy, providing distinction for small businesses and promoting unity within the community.

“On the other hand,” says Mike Schreiner, co-founder of Local Food Plus (LFP), a national organization in Canada that certifies farmers and food processors committed to sustainable food, and links them to local buyers, “There’s a whole host of other environmental ramifications from production.”

Animal waste from an industrial farm is disposed of

Animal waste from an industrial farm

“One issue,” Schreiner says, “Is just the scale of production.”  He mentions that large-scale farms limit biodiversity and use more fertilizers, heavier equipment, and lead to more greenhouse gas emissions than on smaller farms.  He adds, “There are some studies out there suggesting that methane gas emissions from cattle [contribute] more to greenhouse gases than any other part of a food system.”

“Those are issues… that are of equal concern to the transporting of food and/or of greater concern,” says Schreiner.

Eating locally grown food will not be the ultimate solution for eating to support the environment.  Although “locavores” make choices that involve less transportation, and therefore less greenhouse gas emissions, in reality, delivering food to the consumer only contributes to 4 percent, on average, of emissions in a household’s food-related carbon footprint.  Actually, 83 percent of the footprint comes from the food’s origins, which include raising cows and manufacturing dairy products.[2]

Even if locally grown foods produce less greenhouse gases than those that have to be shipped, it may still create more emissions to grow plants in local heated greenhouses rather than to ship them from warmer climates.  A study by Lincoln University in New Zealand found that, if the use of fuel, electricity, pesticides, animal feed, transportation, storage, and others were factored in, a ton of New Zealand apples emitted the equivalent of 407lbs of carbon dioxide compared to nearly 600lbs in the U.K.; this means that it is still significantly less harmful for the U.K. to import the apples than grow them locally.[3]   More important than eating locally is to know what you’re eating and how the food has been grown and manufactured.

LFP’s goal is “to narrow the distance between farmer and shopper,” says Schreiner.  He says it provides people, especially those in developed countries who eat highly processed, unhealthy foods that lead to obesity, with healthier, fresher products.  Also, “Local foods help stabilize markets.”

The perks of eating local food are not to be ignored.  There is a lot to be said for knowing where your food comes from.  Community Supported Agriculture (CSA) has become a popular way for people to buy local, seasonal food right from the farmer.  This enables the farmer to receive money before the crops are ready and lets consumers interact with the farmer, visit the farm, learn about how their food is being grown and find out exactly what’s in it.  Tens of thousands of Americans have joined CSAs and, although the government does not keep track of how many there are, approximately 2500 have signed up with LocalHarvest, which has the most extensive list of American CSAs.[4]

THe Fifth Town Artisan Cheese team

The Fifth Town Artisan Cheese team

Ideally, foods would be grown locally, but also sustainably, to support the community and keep the environment healthy.  A good example of a farm that does both of these things is Fifth Town Artisan Cheese Company, which is LFP-certified and recently won the Premier’s Award of $100,000 at the Premier’s Agri-Food Innovation Awards in Ontario.  It won the award for their use of solar, wind and geothermal energy, green cleaning agents, biodegradable packaging and environmentally friendly waste treatment.[5]

1  MacKinnon, J.B. and Aliza Smith.  The 100-Mile Diet.  Toronto: Vintage Canada, 2007.
2  Liaw, Jane.  “Food miles are less important to environment than food choices, study concludes.”  2 Jun 2008. http://news.mongabay.com/2008/0602-ucsc_liaw_food_miles.html
3  Woods, Richard.  “Why long-haul foods may be greener than local food with low air-miles.”  3 Feb 2008. http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/environment/article3294448.ece
4  LocalHarvest. “Community Supported Agriculture.” http://www.localharvest.org/csa/
5  Local Food Plus.  “LFP Certified Farmer Wins Premier’s Innovation Award.”  http://www.localfoodplus.ca/Fifth_Town.htm

$150B/yr Investment in Building Efficiency gives 2X long-term return of stocks

Posted Thursday, May 21st, 2009 by admin

energy-efficiency-in-buildings-report-193-x-193

A $150 billion a year can be invested in energy efficiency retrofits of buildings in six major markets with returns substantially better than the stock market and real estate investing.

In 2008 buildings account for 40% of the world’s energy use — resulting carbon emissions substantially greater than those from the transportation sector.

Aggressive reductions in energy use in buildings in order to reduce the planet’s energy-related carbon footprint by 77% (or 48 Gigatons) by 2050 to stabilize CO2 levels as called for by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).

At $US60 per barrel oil, $150 billion a year can be invested building energy efficiency in the six markets which will reduce energy use and carbon footprints by 40% with five year discounted paybacks. That’s a 20% internal rate of return (IRR) – better than the long-term historical stock market returns (10% IRR) and better than real estate investment (16% IRR).

A further US$ 150 billion a year can be invested with paybacks between five and 10 years (10% to 20% IRR) will further reduce energy use and carbon emissions by 12% and bring the total reduction to slightly more than half.

Energy Efficiency in Buildings: Transforming the Market released May 2009 developed by World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD) and published by Continental Automated Buildings Association (CABA) focused on six markets that produce more than half of the world’s GDP and generate almost two-thirds of global primary energy: Brazil, China, Europe, India, Japan and the US.

10% electricity wasted by ‘vampire power’ in homes

Posted Thursday, May 21st, 2009 by admin

By: Jordana Levine

Up to 10 percent of household electricity is wasted in homes around the world. Even when electrical appliances and equipment are not being used, they still draw away power, causing electricity bills to swell and contributing to one percent of the world’s carbon dioxide emissions.[1]

Standby power, also called vampire power, phantom power, or leaking electricity, is the power that is used by anything electronic when it is not switched on.  Although it may seem that an appliance is idle, it usually uses electricity to be prepared for a remote control, show the time on a digital clock or standby light, or, much of the time, do nothing at all.  When something is plugged into the wall, it sucks away power, acting as an “electricity vampire.”

Smart Strip

Smart Strip

Although many products have some sort of indicator to show that they are an electricity vampire, such as a display, remote control, or rechargeable batteries, some are secret suckers.  The only way to tell with those ones is to use a meter to measure the energy they use.

A DVD player can use over 10.5 watts of energy when it is turned off, a garage door opener uses an average of 4.48 watts when it is idle and ready, and a rear-projection television uses nearly 7 watts on average when it is turned off, but it can use up to 48.5 watts, depending on the model.[2]

Each watt used costs an average of $1 US per year for any one of the 28 countries that is a member of the International Energy Agency (IEA). Although this may not seem like a lot, when you take into account the numerous appliances, usually 40 or more, scattered around a household, the cost can be astronomical.[3]

Vampire power can be decreased with common sense, or by using advanced technology. One way is to simply unplug appliances or use a power strip to switch them

Watt Stoppers Digital Lighting Management System

Watt Stopper's Digital Lighting Management System

off when you aren’t using them.  Unplugging battery chargers when the batteries are fully charged can also be helpful.[4]

Companies have also created a variety of products to stop the vampire load.  The Smart Strip is one example; it’s a power strip that has different outlets to plug your electronics into – some shut down when the appliance is switched off and some stay on all the time, so you can keep the things on that need to be on all the time and let others turn off when they’re not being used.

Watt Stopper is a company with a full line of products including some similar to the Smart Strip, and some that use motion detectors, light detectors, controlled outlets, and other tools. There are products for home and business.

The Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory in California believes that, although most savings will be very low individually, it is possible to decrease standby power by 75 percent overall.[5]   With new technologies spewing out all over the place, the reduction process should be a lot easier.

1  Energy Analysis Department. “Standby Power: Frequently Asked Questions.”  2009. http://standby.lbl.gov/faq.html
2  International Energy Agency.  “Reducing Standby Power Waste to Less than 1 Watt: A Relevant Global Strategy that Delivers.” 2002.  www.iea.org/textbase/papers/2002/globe02.pdf
3  Ibid.
4  U.S. Department of Energy.  “Energy Savers Tips: Home Office and Home Electronics.”  22 Jan 2009. http://www1.eere.energy.gov/consumer/tips/home_office.html
5  Energy Analysis Dept. “Standby Power.”

Video

A Crisis is a terrible thing to waste – Coming 2010

Jim Harris discusses the 4 concurrent challenges that nations are currently facing and provides a set of solutions in his new book A Crisis is a terrible thing to waste.

More Videos...

Tag Cloud

Associated Links