Archive for June, 2009

National Column on Energy Efficiency in National Post

Posted Friday, June 26th, 2009 by admin
Today marks the inaugural column in the National Post on energy efficiency. You can read the column at http://bit.ly/7EJtJt
The theme is how going green is the best thing ever for the corporate bottom line. The column, which appears on the back page of the Financial Post section, will provide practical, proven ways of how going green can save money in these tough times.

Of course I’d love to hear your ideas I should cover in the column: it’s all about how going green is the best thing ever for the bottom line. Email your ideas to me at jimh (at) jimharris.com

Please post the column to your Facebook, digg it, stumble on it so that 1) this important info gets out widely & 2) the National Post continues to expand its coverage of this essential area! jim-harris-head-furniture-np

DLSC homes decrease GHGs by 5 tonnes each/yr

Posted Monday, June 15th, 2009 by admin

jlevineBy: Jordana Levine

The first of its kind in North America, the Drake Landing Solar Community (DLSC) is heating its homes with solar energy and reducing five tonnes of greenhouse gases per year in every house.  The community, located in Okotoks, Alberta, has 52 homes heated by seasonal thermal energy storage; the solar heat is stored underground in the summer and used in the homes during the winter.

The project, which was first created by Natural Resources Canada (NRCan), began collecting solar energy in June of 2007 and, after five years, the community is expected to receive 90 percent of its heat from solar alone. The need for non-renewable fossil fuels will diminish and shift to a cleaner and more sustainable unlimited source of energy: the sun.

The DLSC project leader, Doug MeClenahan, says that there are almost no other projects like this one anywhere in the world.  “You could probably count them on two hands.”dlsc-aerial

The community’s space and water heating comes from solar energy, which is collected by 800 panels arranged on garage roofs around the community.  Each panel generates about 1.5 MW of thermal power on a summer’s day. There is a combination of seasonal and short-term thermal storage (STTS), with boreholes in the ground to store the seasonal energy.

When heat is transferred to the homes, there is an automatic valve in the basement of every house that shuts off the heat transfer when the temperature of the thermostat in the home is reached.  If the STTS doesn’t have enough heat to distribute to all the homes, there is a back-up gas boiler Energy Centre that will turn on to help out.

Energy in a community the size of the DLSC costs 14 to 17 cents per kWh.  “Fifty-two homes was a reasonable size, but it was still considered to small… to be cost effective today,” says McClenahan. He explains that the next step is an analysis of a larger-scale project using a computer simulation.  The analysis should be completed within a year.

“If you go to larger scale, you have much less surface area for heat loss… so the efficiency can go up considerably,” McClenahan explains.  “The bigger the project, the less cost it is per unit volume or per unit area.”  Drake Landing isn’t that effective now because it’s losing heat on the surface area of the land.

Still, McClenahan says, I know [the technology]’s promising enough that we should pursue it until we are able to do the analysis.”  However, beyond that, he says it’s incredibly difficult to tell exactly what the costs and savings could be in a larger community. “Until we do the analysis, I’d hate to guess.”

The community does more for the environment than just conserve energy, though. Homes are designed with low-impact landscaping and use locally manufactured materials.  The materials used include upgraded insulation, certified sustainable lumber, drywall made from recycled materials, and well-insulated windows, among other environmentally friendly products.

Also, the homes are all required to follow The Town of Okotoks’ water stewardship measures: low flush toilets, ultra low flow showerheads and faucets, and insulated water lines.  Larger homes require a recirculation pump and every home is supplied with a low water consumption dishwasher and clothes washer.  A rain barrel supplies water for gardening.

By the end of the community’s second year, McClenahan says it’s already receiving 67 percent of its space heating from the sun.  “We’re hoping that this will continue to increase” to over 90 percent.

“I would like to see, in the next 2 to 3 years, a [larger] follow-up project,” says McClenahan, hopefully with bigger cities in Canada like Toronto and Montreal.  “We don’t want to end up with just one demonstration and that’s it.”

Intel to open LEED certified building in Israel

Posted Friday, June 12th, 2009 by admin

Intel in Haifa

By: Jordana Levine

After much debate and analysis, Intel is preparing to open its first green-registered building.[1]  The research and development building in Haifa, Israel will cost $600,000 of green investments, which will be paid off in just three years.[2]

The building will follow the Leadership in Energy and Environmental (LEED) rating system, which is a voluntary, consensus-based standard to develop sustainable and efficient buildings.[3]  The Intel building is receiving the LEED certification for a variety of technologies that the building is being outfitted with; it will have an environmentally friendly construction process with green materials, natural lighting via an internal patio that distributes light from an atrium, efficient electricity and air conditioning and an irrigation system that uses recycled water only.[4]  It is set to open in early in 2010.[5]

Intel hopes that the building in Haifa will lead to more LEED certified office buildings and, ultimately, to Intel’s first LEED certified Fab.  A Fab is a semiconductor fabrication plant, meaning it is a factory that fabricates designs for other companies to use as well.[6]

Although Intel has reduced its overall needs for freshwater in the long run, the corporation’s water consumption actually rose by four percent between 2007 and 2008.  Intel says this increase is probably because of production growth and the complexity of its new manufacturing processes, which require more water.[7]  Although some countries can withstand this strain on their freshwater supply, it could be detrimental to Israel’s fragile water supply, which has to be monitored carefully as it is.

Overall, Intel cut its greenhouse gas emission by 27 percent in 2008, and the company’s Corporate Responsibility Report aims to decrease its carbon footprint by 20 percent from 2007 until 2012.  Intel is a strong supporter of green power, having bought over 1 billion kWh of green power each year to fulfill 47 percent of the company’s electricity needs; Intel also built the first solar installations.[8]

In 2009, Intel will invest more than $5 million on over 30 projects to save a minimum of 30 million kWh of electricity each year.  The corporation has already targeted energy efficiency and conservation since 2001, saving Intel more than $50 million and 500 million kWh.[9]

1  Kloosterman, Karin.  “Intel Makes a Green Debut in Haifa, Israel.”  TreeHugger.  8 Dec 2006.  http://www.treehugger.com/files/2006/12/intel_makes_a_g.php
2  Solomon, Stephen.  “Intel Saves Air and Money.” Scientific American – Earth 3.0: 18.5, 2008.
3  Kloosterman, Karin.  “Intel Makes a Green Debut.”
4  “Intel’s First Green Building.”  http://www.intel.com/cd/corporate/europe/emea/eng/339775.htm
5  “Intel Cuts Emissions by 27% in 2008.”  Environmental Leader.  21 May 2009.  http://www.environmentalleader.com/2009/05/21/intel-cuts-emissions-by-27-in-2008/
6  “Intel’s First Green Building.”
7  “Intel Cuts Emissions.”
8  “Intel Cuts Emissions.”
9  Ibid.

New Google gadget shows energy consumption online

Posted Thursday, June 11th, 2009 by admin

By: Jordana Levine

Google is creating yet another application personalized to its users.  The Google PowerMeter will soon allow customers to see detailed description of their homes’ energy consumption.

Although many homes have ‘smart meters,’ which allow people to access information about their electricity, they don’t yet have an easy way to look at the details of their energy usage.  The PowerMeter works by sending the information from the smart meter to the internet, where it is read and analyzed.  The PowerMeter will show customers the elements of their energy usage through a Google gadget… for free!

Google found that for every six households that save 10 percent on electricity, it is the equivalent of reducing carbon emissions by one regular car.  Studies show if you get to look at your personal energy information, it is likely that you’ll end up saving 5-15% on monthly power bills – and people who actually take the time to replace old energy-draining appliances can save much more. So using the PowerMeter could help lower emissions immensely.

The product isn’t widely available yet, but it’s being tested on a handful of Google’s employees and utility partners.  Toronto Hydro is participating in the test run, along with eight other partners from the US and India.  The PowerMeter is expected to go public later in 2009.

To find out more, go to the Google PowerMeter website.

UK committed to 40,000 green jobs in 5 years

Posted Thursday, June 11th, 2009 by admin

jlevineBy: Jordana Levine

Britain’s Prime Minister Gordon Brown plans to create the first ‘green cities’ in the world.  His goal is to introduce huge numbers of electric cars on the streets of Britain and create 40,000 green collar jobs in the next five years.[1]

The 2009 Budget, announced in April, is supposed to boost a ‘green recovery’ for the country, aiming to cut carbon emissions by 34 percent in 2020.  It is the world’s first binding, short-term carbon budget, committed to building carbon capture and storage facilities, creating renewable energy projects, and providing incentives for efficient power plants.[2]

£1.4 billion of funding (Can$2.5 billion) has been allotted to fight climate change through supporting low-carbon industries and green collar jobs alone.  The £1.4 billion has been broken down to fund offshore wind projects, energy and resource efficiency for personal and professional use, low-carbon technologies and more.  As well, the European Investment Bank has set aside £4 billion for renewable energy projects and an investment of £2.5 billion will make sure that combined heat and power plants don’t have to pay the climate change levy.[3]

The Budget will invite councils to bid to become Britain’s first green cities, of which there will be two or three, that will get to run trials for electric cars among other things.[4]  PM Brown says that the government would gives incentives to car companies to create a worldwide market for electric and hybrid cars out of Britain.  In April 2009, the European Investment Bank approved over £700 million in loans for Jaguar Land Rover and Nissan to develop green vehicles.[5]

To make the purchase of low-emitting vehicles easier, the Budget will allow British residents to scrap their old cars and buy a new, environmentally friendly vehicle with a £2,000 discount.  The scheme is expected to save the nation’s motor industry in by creating demand for new cars and increasing consumer confidence.[6] However, some analysts believe that scrapping the cars could actually increase emissions. [7]

1  Grice, Andrew.  “Brown’s electric dream for Britain.” The Independent.  8 April 2009.
2  “Budget 2009: Green measures at a glace.”  Guardian.co.uk.  22 Apr 2009. http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2009/apr/22/budget-2009-green-measures
3  Ibid.
4  Grice, Andrew.  “Brown’s electric dream.”
5  Ibid.
6 Wang, Dongying and Rob Welham.  “Scrappage scheme launched in Britain to save car industry.”  Xinhua News Agency.  21 May 2009.
7  “Budget 2009.”

$2500 Tata Nano gets 67mpg

Posted Wednesday, June 10th, 2009 by admin

tata-nanoBy: Jordana Levine

The Tata Nano, launched in March 2009, is by far the cheapest car on the market, costing a mere $2,500.  It gets an average of 57mpg — and with careful driving can get up to 67mpg, which is better than almost any car on the road; the Toyota Prius gets 48mpg driving in the city – and even the SmartCar can’t compete, getting 33mpg on city streets and 41mpg on the highway.[1]

The Nano is in high demand; the first 100,000 cars produced will be distributed through a lottery.  Although the cars are cheap, customers are expected to pay deposits totaling up to $1 billion if they want to get their hands on the first batch of Nanos.  Also, while the basic Nano is only $2500, it is likely that the majority of the cars sold will be the more upscale models, since the basic one doesn’t even include air conditioning or cup holders.[2][3]

There are expected to be up to 300,000 Nanos on the roads in India by 2010[4], and although the car is exceptionally fuel efficient, critics are worried about the traffic and noise and air pollution that the sudden increase in cars could create.[5] Hopefully this innovation will help the environment, though, rather than hurt it, by providing developing countries with affordable cars that conserve fuel.

1  “Most and Least Efficient Vehicles.”  http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/best/bestworstNF.shtml
2  “The new people’s car.”  The Economist.  28 Mar 2009.
3  “Tata ‘NANO’ – The People’s Car from Tata Motors.”  2008.  http://tatanano.inservices.tatamotors.com/tatamotors/index.php?option=com_whynano&task=features&Itemid=301
4  “The new people’s car.”
5  “Tata Motors rolls out Nano, the world’s cheapest car.”  The Associated Press.  10 Jan 2008. http://www.cbc.ca/consumer/story/2008/01/10/nano-tata.html

Green Energy Act could create 90,000 jobs in Ontario

Posted Tuesday, June 9th, 2009 by admin

building-the-green-economy

By: Jordana Levine

The Green Energy Act (GEA) could employ over 90,000 Ontarians in green jobs.   Government of Ontario is prepared to initiate the GEA, which focuses on the possibilities for employment if a large investment is made in green practices.  Along with increasing employment opportunities, the program could have a huge positive impact on the environment.

The main goals of the GEA are to ensure that Ontario is the country’s leading green economy, create over 50,000 green collar jobs, and generate billions of dollars worth of economic activity as quickly as possible – ideally in three years.  The plan involves phasing out the province’s coal plants by 2014 and shifting the province’s economy so that it is based on energy efficiency and renewable energy sources.

Building the Green Economy: Employment Effects of Green Energy Investments for Ontario is a report done by the Political Economy Research Institute, which gives recommendations and ideas regarding the GEA.  The report identifies two levels of investment that would help the GEA.  The first program is the baseline Integrated Power System Plan (IPSP), which would invest $18.6 billion over the next ten years in: conservation and demand management, hydroelectric power, on-shore wind energy, bioenergy, waste energy recycling and solar power.

However, the report also looks at an enhanced green investment program, which is referred to as the Green Energy Act Alliance (GEAA) plan.  The GEAA plan would involve spending $47.1 billion over ten years and would do everything the baseline IPSP would do, plus it would invest in off-shore wind energy and a smart grid electrical transmission system for Ontario.

Although the baseline IPSP would generate 35,000 jobs, the expanded GEAA program would create 90,000 jobs for Ontarians.  The occupations created would range from construction workers to financial auditors and engineers to research scientists.  For the most part, wages would exceed $20 per hour.

Three types of employment effects would come out of these programs: direct, indirect and induced effects.  The direct effects would be the jobs created within Ontario by the environmentally related activities, such as conservation, hydroelectricity and solar power.  The indirect effects involve jobs associated with these green industries that provide goods and services for the green investment activities, like hardware and metals.  Induced effects would be the employment that is created when the people who are paid via green investment projects spend the money they earn on other products and services within the province.

The baseline IPSP would lead to 15,500 direct jobs, 11,600 indirect, and 8,100 induced, while the expanded GEAA program would create 38,400 direct, 31,100 indirect and 20,900 induced jobs.

The IPSP would create nearly 12,000 MW of new electricity or conservation capacity; the expanded GEAA program would produce over 22,000, though.  In March 2009, the Ontario Power Authority operated with about 27,000 MW of electricity-generating capacity.  This means that the $47.1 billion investment program could either replace or expand capacity by 82 percent in the province (and the IPSP by 44 percent), leading to higher efficiency and a huge increase in renewable energy levels.

Nations everywhere boast a ‘green stimulus’

Posted Monday, June 8th, 2009 by admin

jlevineBy: Jordana Levine

International climate change talks are continuing in Bonn, Germany.  The second round of discussions begun on June 1, 2009, and the negotiating time for the 192 collaborating countries ends in mid-July. By then, they need to reach an agreement with new emissions reduction targets and compensation packages for poor countries that have already been him with impacts of climate change.  These new decisions will be the basis for the final negotiations in Copenhagen in December 2009.[1]

These discussions on how to replace Kyoto Protocol targets are pushing countries to pump money into a “green stimulus.”  China and the US, who never signed the Kyoto Protocol, are likely to join in the new plans for shrinking greenhouse gas emissions.[2]

Canada has set aside eight percent, or US$2.6 billion of its total stimulus package, for green measures.  Although Canada’s emissions have gone in the opposite direction, reaching 26 percent above the 1990 levels and 33.8 percent above the country’s Kyoto targets[3], the country has agreed to cut emissions by 20 percent from 2006 to 2020.  The majority of the money is estimated to increase clean energy and create 407,000 jobs over 5 years:[4]

greenstimulus-graphs-ft-canada

The US is setting aside $112.3 billion for green measures, 12 percent of its fiscal stimulus.  The nation’s first stimulus package, which was approved in October 2008, contained a lot more features than the second one, which was approved February 2009 and cut out $57 billion of environmental spending.  Originally, it would have included $18.2 billion in taxes cuts and clean energy credits and $2 billion for carbon capture and storage.  Still, the updated stimulus gives $22.5 billion for renewable energy incentives, $52 billion for energy efficiency, including updating the electricity grid, and $10 billion for public transit.  The green stimulus is projected to create 2.5 million green jobs.[5]

China, the country whose emissions grew 250 percent between 1990 and 2006, plans to use 38 percent of its stimulus, equivalent to US$22.8 billion, to go green, according to HSBC.  (However, Beijing and other economists say this number is higher than what they will invest.)  Their green package will include over ¥350 billion (US$51 billion) for environmental projects and around ¥450 billion (US$66 billion) for the country’s rail infrastructure.[6]  China is spending the most money per-capita to invest in going green.[7]

The European Union has set aside a whopping 59 percent of its fiscal stimulus, €16.4 billion (of US$22.8 billion), for green measures.  The EU recovery plan should get the European Investment Bank to give an extra €12 billion of funding for green infrastructure over two years.[8]

1 Marsden, William.  “Crunch time for climate talks.”  Ottawa Citizen.  6 Jun 2009. http://www.ottawacitizen.com/business/fp/Crunch+time+climate+talks/1669662/story.html
2  Pedersen, Mike.  “Keeping ahead of the green curve.” Ottawa Citizen.  5 Jun 2009.   http://www.ottawacitizen.com/Technology/Keeping+ahead+green+curve/1652801/story.html
3  Munro, Margaret.  “Canada may be blowing smoke about intentions to reduce greenhouse gas.”  Canada.com.  21 Apr 2009.  http://www.canada.com/Canada+blowing+smoke+about+intentions+reduce+greenhouse/1517913/story.html
4  Bernard, Steve and others.  “Which country has the greenest bail-out?” Financial Times.  2 Mar 2009.  http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/cc207678-0738-11de-9294-000077b07658.html?nclick_check=1
5  Steve Bernard and others. “Which country?”
6  Steve Bernard and others. “Which country?”
7  Mike Pedersen.  “Keeping ahead”
8  Steve Bernard and others. “Which country?”

Energy Efficiency cheapest way to replace Ontario’s aging nuclear power

Posted Friday, June 5th, 2009 by admin

ocaa-reportBy: Jordana Levine

Energy efficiency, renewable energy and co-generation alternatives provide cheaper, more secure, and less wasteful forms of electricity generation than nuclear, concludes a new report, Powerful Options: A review of Ontario’s options for replacing aging nuclear plants. Increased funding for electric utilities’ energy efficiency programs, establishing fees for natural gas-fired combined heat and power (CHP) and making long-term electricity supply agreements with Quebec and Newfoundland and Labrador would all provide the power Ontario needs in the future as aging nuclear plants are phased out. The research report by the Ontario Clean Air Alliance (OCAA) was released in May 2009.

By 2021, 47 percent of Ontario’s nuclear power will be gone because the generators will be past their service life.  That means 60.4 billion kWh of nuclear power will need to be replaced. The Government of Ontario plans to sign a contract to build two nuclear reactors at the Darlington Nuclear Station east of Oshawa.  The report points out that conservation and efficiency would cost only 2.7 cents per kWh and, if the power authority was to aggressively promote efficiency — demand for electricity will fall by 28.6 billion kWh between 2008 and 2021.

The OCAA doesn’t support replacing old nuclear reactors with new ones, and recommends that, instead, the provincial government require the Ontario Power Authority (OPA) to get serious about energy efficiency (EE), renewable energy (RE) and co-generation.

The construction of new nuclear generators costs more than any of the five other options that the OCAA gives for how to maintain Ontario’s power supply when the old generators die.  It costs at least 15.1 cents US per kWh (or 18 cents Canadian as of May 2009).  It also has a history of higher-than-projected costs, quickly aging equipment and unexpected errors.  Overall, nuclear power is suggested to be the least reliable option.

The replacement options that the OCAA gives are:
•    Conservation and efficiency to reduce need for electricity
•    Wind power
•    Natural gas-fired CHP (combined heat and power)
•    Renewable electricity imports from Quebec
•    Hydro-electricity imports from Labrador

In terms of wind power, Ontario’s onshore potential alone is 11 times as much as Ontario’s electricity consumption each year, meaning it could easily cover all of the lost nuclear power.  Also, even though the power is intermittent, Ontario and Quebec could join forces and share excess generation at times when winds are mild in some areas.  At the 2010 rates, Quebec could replace 40 percent of the lost power from nuclear at only 9 cents per kWh.  Labrador could also contribute 28 percent of Ontario’s lost power in 2021 for the same price.

Natural gas-fired CHP, although it can emit more greenhouse gases than nuclear power plants, has an efficiency of 80 to 90 percent versus a nuclear reactor’s efficiency of 33 percent because it uses the same molecules of gas to produce heat and electricity at the same time.  Natural gas-fired CHP could supply 100% of the lost power from nuclear for a mere six cents per kWh.

Ontario will have phased out almost all coal by January 2010, accomplishing the largest greenhouse gas reduction initiative in North America.  The phase-out is the equivalent of taking nearly seven million cars off the road.  The next step is figuring out how to replace nuclear power to make the air even cleaner.

Renewable energy creates more jobs than fossil fuels

Posted Thursday, June 4th, 2009 by admin

By: Jordana Levine.

If renewable energy production in the US was increased 20% by 2020, 185,000 new jobs would be created in renewable energy development.  Consumers would also save $10.5 billion on electricity and gas bills and farmers, ranchers, and rural landowners would have $25.6 billion added to their total income.

The Renewable and Appropriate Energy Laboratory in Berkeley discovered that renewable energy not only creates more jobs per megawatt of power installed, but also more jobs per unit of energy produced and per dollar invested compared to the fossil fuel energy sector.

In the European Union, net employment growth in the EU is projected to increase to 950,000 with current policies, and up to 1,666,000 jobs by 2010 under the Advanced Renewable Strategy (ARS) that has been implemented.  Renewable energy would also make up 22.1% of the EU’s total energy by 2010

The Environmental Energy Study Institute has a fact sheet discussing jobs from renewable energy and energy efficiency both within the US and around the world.  It lists the improvements in energy resources, including the increase in wind, geothermal, solar and tidal energy and well as biofuels and clean-coal plants.  The fact sheet shows the immense number of jobs that these industries add to the economy.

The full fact sheet can be downloaded at the EESI website

Video

A Crisis is a terrible thing to waste – Coming 2010

Jim Harris discusses the 4 concurrent challenges that nations are currently facing and provides a set of solutions in his new book A Crisis is a terrible thing to waste.

More Videos...

Tag Cloud

Associated Links